Ace the California RDH Law & Ethics Exam 2026 – Smile Bright and Rule Right!

The ethical obligation of a therapist when a family expresses readiness to terminate therapy centers around the best interests of the individuals involved, particularly when regressive symptoms may be present. If there are any indicators of these symptoms in any family member, it is ethically sound to recommend individual therapy. This approach allows for continued support for those who may need it while respecting the family's desire to move on with their therapeutic journey.

Therapists are ethically bound to ensure that clients are prepared for termination and that it is in their best interest. If signs of regression are present, suggesting individual therapy acknowledges the complexities of mental health and the necessity for tailored interventions for those who may not be ready to end their therapeutic relationship. This choice reinforces the therapist's role in acting with care and against premature termination of necessary psychological support.

Other choices do not reflect this ethical obligation as clearly. While documenting agreement may seem appropriate, it does not actively address the ongoing needs and potential struggles of the family members. Simply recommending to stay in therapy or terminating outright without considering individual circumstances may neglect the unique needs of individuals within the family unit, undermining the overall therapeutic process. Prioritizing individual therapy in the face of regression not only supports the therapy's integrity but also aligns with ethical standards of care in